On 12/16/19 2:01 PM, Lukasz Luba wrote: > Hi Bartek, > > [added Dietmar, Robin, Andrzej (for upcoming DRM drm-misc-next)] > > On 11/15/19 12:40 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: [...] >> Hmmm.. fixing partition_enable_opps() should be trivial but I wonder >> why we are carrying devfreq_cooling.c code in upstream kernel at all? > > Well, the devfreq_cooling.c is going to have a client in mainline: > the GPU driver - Panfrost. > > It is already in DRM branch 'drm-misc-next': > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/342848/ OK, thanks for explaining this. > Regarding the devfreq_cooling.c code structure. > I am currently working on cleaning up the devfreq cooling code and > adding Energy Model instead for private freq, power tables. It will be > in similar fashion as it is done in cpufreq_cooling. The model will > be also simplified so hopefully more clients would come. > It is under internal review and will be posted shortly. Great to hear this and thank you for working on it. Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
