On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 1:02 AM Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please use capital letter for the first char of patch title
> and better to edit the patch title as following:
> Actually, it is difficult to understand the role by only reading
> the function name. It depends on only this driver.
> So, better to edit it as following because devfreq-event
> is standard name in linux kernel. I think it is easy to understand
> what the patch does.
>
> - PM / devfreq: exynos-bus: Disable the devfreq-event device when failed
>
>
> 2019년 12월 22일 (일) 오전 3:21, Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@xxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:
> >
> > The exynos_bus_profile_init process may fail, but the devfreq event device
> > remains enabled. Call devfreq_event_disable_edev on the error return path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > index 7f5917d59072..5e54eaf3cfc6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > @@ -335,10 +335,14 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> > ret = exynos_bus_set_event(bus);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > dev_err(dev, "failed to set event to devfreq-event devices\n");
> > - return ret;
> > + goto err_disable_edev;
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> > +
> > +err_disable_edev:
>
> err_edev is enough instead of 'err_disable_edev'
>
> > + exynos_bus_disable_edev(bus);
>
> exynos_bus_disable_edev() has return value for detecting the error.
> Need to add following warning message.
>
> if (ret < 0)
> dev_warn(dev, "failed to disable the devfreq-event devices\n");
I'm not sure if it should be like this,
it may rewrite the above error code.
Yangtao
>
>
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > static int exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Chanwoo Choi
