Hi,
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 9:02 PM Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This patch adds interconnect functionality to the exynos-bus devfreq
> driver.
>
> The SoC topology is a graph (or, more specifically, a tree) and its
> edges are specified using the 'exynos,interconnect-parent-node' in the
> DT. Due to unspecified relative probing order, -EPROBE_DEFER may be
> propagated to ensure that the parent is probed before its children.
>
> Each bus is now an interconnect provider and an interconnect node as well
> (cf. Documentation/interconnect/interconnect.rst), i.e. every bus registers
> itself as a node. Node IDs are not hardcoded but rather assigned at
> runtime, in probing order (subject to the above-mentioned exception
> regarding relative order). This approach allows for using this driver with
> various Exynos SoCs.
>
> Frequencies requested via the interconnect API for a given node are
> propagated to devfreq using dev_pm_qos_update_request(). Please note that
> it is not an error when CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is 'n', in which case all
> interconnect API functions are no-op.
>
> Signed-off-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 144 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> index 9fdb188915e8..694a9581dcdb 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> @@ -14,14 +14,19 @@
> #include <linux/devfreq-event.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/idr.h>
> +#include <linux/interconnect-provider.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>
> #define DEFAULT_SATURATION_RATIO 40
>
> +#define kbps_to_khz(x) ((x) / 8)
> +
> struct exynos_bus {
> struct device *dev;
>
> @@ -35,6 +40,12 @@ struct exynos_bus {
> struct opp_table *opp_table;
> struct clk *clk;
> unsigned int ratio;
> +
> + /* One provider per bus, one node per provider */
> + struct icc_provider provider;
> + struct icc_node *node;
> +
> + struct dev_pm_qos_request qos_req;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -205,6 +216,39 @@ static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
> clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
> }
>
> +static int exynos_bus_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
> +{
> + struct exynos_bus *src_bus = src->data, *dst_bus = dst->data;
> + s32 src_freq = kbps_to_khz(src->avg_bw);
> + s32 dst_freq = kbps_to_khz(dst->avg_bw);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(&src_bus->qos_req, src_freq);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(src_bus->dev, "failed to update PM QoS request");
To catch the correct error point, better to add 'src node' to error message
as following:
dev_err(src_bus->dev, "failed to update PM QoS of %s\n",
dev_name(src_bus->dev.parent))
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(&dst_bus->qos_req, dst_freq);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dst_bus->dev, "failed to update PM QoS request");
ditto.
dev_err(src_bus->dev, "failed to update PM QoS of %s\n",
dev_name(dst_bus->dev.parent))
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct icc_node *exynos_bus_icc_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *spec,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + struct exynos_bus *bus = data;
> +
> + if (spec->np != bus->dev->of_node)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + return bus->node;
> +}
> +
> static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
> struct exynos_bus *bus)
> {
> @@ -419,6 +463,96 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct icc_node *exynos_bus_icc_get_parent(struct exynos_bus *bus)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = bus->dev->of_node;
> + struct of_phandle_args args;
> + int num, ret;
> +
> + num = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "exynos,interconnect-parent-node",
> + "#interconnect-cells");
> + if (num != 1)
> + return NULL; /* parent nodes are optional */
You better to add the comment before calling exynos_bus_icc_get_parent
and remove '/* parent nodes are optional */'. Actually, it is not enough
to understand the role of 'interconnect-parent-node' with '/* parent
nodes are optional */'.
And I add my opinion about this comment below.
And I expect that you will add the description and example for
'exynos,interconnect-parent-node' on exynos-bus dt-binding document.
> +
> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "exynos,interconnect-parent-node",
> + "#interconnect-cells", 0, &args);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + of_node_put(args.np);
> +
> + return of_icc_get_from_provider(&args);
> +}
> +
> +static int exynos_bus_icc_init(struct exynos_bus *bus)
> +{
> + static DEFINE_IDA(ida);
> +
> + struct device *dev = bus->dev;
> + struct icc_provider *provider = &bus->provider;
> + struct icc_node *node, *parent_node;
> + int id, ret;
> +
> + /* Initialize the interconnect provider */
> + provider->set = exynos_bus_icc_set;
> + provider->aggregate = icc_std_aggregate;
> + provider->xlate = exynos_bus_icc_xlate;
> + provider->dev = dev;
> + provider->inter_set = true;
> + provider->data = bus;
> +
> + ret = icc_provider_add(provider);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = id = ida_alloc(&ida, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_id;
> +
> + node = icc_node_create(id);
> + if (IS_ERR(node)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(node);
> + goto err_node;
> + }
> +
> + bus->node = node;
> + node->name = dev->of_node->name;
> + node->data = bus;
> + icc_node_add(node, provider);
> +
Better to add the following comment. If you add following comment
before calling exynos_bus_icc_get_parent, don't need to add the
same comment into exynos_bus_icc.
/* If interconnect parent node is not existing, don't use
interconnect feature */
> + parent_node = exynos_bus_icc_get_parent(bus);
> + if (IS_ERR(parent_node)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(parent_node);
> + goto err_parent;
> + }
> +
> + if (parent_node) {
Better to change this if statement as following:
else if (parent_node)
> + ret = icc_link_create(node, parent_node->id);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_parent;
> + }
> +
> + ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(bus->devfreq->dev.parent, &bus->qos_req,
> + DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY, 0);
Is it necessary if interconnect-parent-node is not existing?
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_request;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_request:
> + if (parent_node)
> + icc_link_destroy(node, parent_node);
> +err_parent:
> + icc_node_del(node);
> + icc_node_destroy(id);
> +err_node:
> + ida_free(&ida, id);
> +err_id:
> + icc_provider_del(provider);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -468,6 +602,16 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto err;
>
> + /*
> + * Initialize interconnect provider. A return value of -ENOTSUPP means
> + * that CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is disabled.
> + */
> + ret = exynos_bus_icc_init(bus);
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOTSUPP) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize the interconnect provider");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> max_state = bus->devfreq->profile->max_state;
> min_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[0] / 1000);
> max_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[max_state - 1] / 1000);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
