Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: define EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 19. 12. 7. 오후 10:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 at 14:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 10:00:48PM +0900, Hyunki Koo wrote:
From: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Not all exynos device have IRQ_COMBINER.
Thus add the config for EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER.

Signed-off-by: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig  | 7 +++++++
  drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +-
  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Hi,

There is no changelog and versioning of this patch so I do not
understand how it differs with previous. It's a resend? v2? It brings
the confusion and looks like you're ignoring previous comments.

Looks the same and looks like breaking Exynos platforms in the same way.

If you not want to skip combiner on ARMv8, it makes sense, then please
follow the approach we did for Pinctrl drivers (PINCTRL_EXYNOS_ARM and
PINCTRL_EXYNOS_ARM64).

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Ah, now I see the second patch. Still you break bisect which requires
specific ordering of patches or squashing them into one. Optionally
this could be default=y if ARCH_EXYNOS && ARM. I prefer just squashing
both into one patch in this case.

you mean squashing two files arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig and arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig into one patch

or squashing into only one file like blow?

+config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER
+       bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support"
+       depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS  && ARM) || COMPILE_TEST
+       default y

I prefer first one (squashing two files into one patch)


diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
index ba152954324b..3ed7b7f2ae26 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
@@ -499,4 +499,11 @@ config SIFIVE_PLIC

          If you don't know what to do here, say Y.

+config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER
+     bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support"
Now point it to be visible. Only for COMPILE_TEST

+     depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
Since you make it a separate option, make it COMPILE_TEST.

Is this  good ?

+config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER

+       bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support"
+       depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS  && ARM) || COMPILE_TEST


Best regards,
Krzysztof

+     help
+       Say yes here to add support for the IRQ combiner devices embedded
+       in Samsung Exynos chips.
+
  endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
index e806dda690ea..60d7c7260fc3 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835)            += irq-bcm2835.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835)           += irq-bcm2836.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_DAVINCI_AINTC)          += irq-davinci-aintc.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_DAVINCI_CP_INTC)                += irq-davinci-cp-intc.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)            += exynos-combiner.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER)    += exynos-combiner.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_FARADAY_FTINTC010)              += irq-ftintc010.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HIP04)             += irq-hip04.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LPC32XX)           += irq-lpc32xx.o
--
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux