On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:43:04AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:53:02AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 22-10-19, 17:09, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > When building with Clang + -Wtautological-pointer-compare:
> > >
> > > drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c:152:6: warning: comparison of array
> > > 's3c64xx_freq_table' equal to a null pointer is always false
> > > [-Wtautological-pointer-compare]
> > > if (s3c64xx_freq_table == NULL) {
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
> > > 1 warning generated.
> > >
> > > The definition of s3c64xx_freq_table is surrounded by an ifdef
> > > directive for CONFIG_CPU_S3C6410, which is always true for this driver
> > > because it depends on it in drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm (and if it
> > > weren't, there would be a build error because s3c64xx_freq_table would
> > > not be a defined symbol).
>
> > +broonie, who wrote this patch to see his views on why he kept it like
> > this.
>
> The driver should also have supported s3c6400 as well.
Kconfig says otherwise, unless I am missing something.
config ARM_S3C64XX_CPUFREQ
bool "Samsung S3C64XX"
depends on CPU_S3C6410
default y
help
This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung S3C6410 SoC.
If in doubt, say N.
Cheers,
Nathan
