Re: [PATCH 11/36] ARM: s5pv210: split from plat-samsung

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:29:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> These can be build completely independently, so split
> the two Kconfig symbols.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

I'd mention the two symbols' names you're working on in the commit log.
I guess it's about PLAT_SAMSUNG and ARCH_S5PV210. And I wouldn't call it
"split" which IMHO suggests there was only one symbol before.

Maybe:

	Don't imply PLAT_SAMSUNG if ARCH_S5PV210 is enabled

would be a better subject line?

> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig.debug        | 6 +++---
>  arch/arm/Makefile             | 1 -
>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig      | 2 +-
>  drivers/pwm/Kconfig           | 2 +-
>  drivers/spi/Kconfig           | 2 +-
>  drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig    | 2 +-
>  sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig     | 2 +-
>  8 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> index 9c4f2d6deb06..4c4e97ae4fcb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ choice
>  		  via SCIFA4 on Renesas SH-Mobile AG5 (SH73A0).
>  
>  	config DEBUG_S3C_UART0
> -		depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG || ARCH_EXYNOS
> +		depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS
>  		select DEBUG_EXYNOS_UART if ARCH_EXYNOS
>  		select DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART if ARCH_S3C24XX
>  		select DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART if ARCH_S3C64XX
> @@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ choice
>  		  by the boot-loader before use.
>  
>  	config DEBUG_S3C_UART1
> -		depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG || ARCH_EXYNOS
> +		depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS
>  		select DEBUG_EXYNOS_UART if ARCH_EXYNOS
>  		select DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART if ARCH_S3C24XX
>  		select DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART if ARCH_S3C64XX
> @@ -1022,7 +1022,7 @@ choice
>  		  by the boot-loader before use.
>  
>  	config DEBUG_S3C_UART2
> -		depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG || ARCH_EXYNOS
> +		depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS
>  		select DEBUG_EXYNOS_UART if ARCH_EXYNOS
>  		select DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART if ARCH_S3C24XX
>  		select DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART if ARCH_S3C64XX
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Makefile b/arch/arm/Makefile
> index f492d7c338fe..a1bc15cda751 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/Makefile
> @@ -235,7 +235,6 @@ machine-$(CONFIG_PLAT_SPEAR)		+= spear
>  # by CONFIG_* macro name.
>  plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP)	+= omap
>  plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S3C64XX)	+= samsung
> -plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S5PV210)	+= samsung

Would it make more sense to make this

	plat-$(PLAT_SAMSUNG) += samsung

(in a separate patch)? Hmm, it seems there is no plat-y for
PLAT_S3C24XX=y builds. Is this intended? If yes, the directory name
containing "samsung" suggests something that seems untrue.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux