On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 19:21, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 8:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 09:51:09AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 18:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > The following changes since commit 5f9e832c137075045d15cd6899ab0505cfb2ca4b: > > > > > > > > Linus 5.3-rc1 (2019-07-21 14:05:38 -0700) > > > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-drivers-5.4 > > > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 40d8aff614f71ab3cab20785b4f213e3802d4e87: > > > > > > > > soc: samsung: chipid: Convert exynos-chipid driver to use the regmap API (2019-08-15 20:25:25 +0200) > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Samsung soc drivers changes for v5.4 > > > > > > > > Add Exynos Chipid driver for identification of product IDs and SoC > > > > revisions. The driver also exposes chipid regmap, later to be used by > > > > Exynos Adaptive Supply Voltage driver (adjusting voltages to different > > > > revisions of same SoC). > > > > > > It turns out that it brings troubles (code is executed on every > > > platform polluting logs because it is an initcall, not a driver) so > > > Sylwester (submitter) asked to skip the submission. > > > > > > Please ignore the pull request. > > > > I talked with Sylwester and Bartlomiej who contributed the chipid driver > > and they provided small incremental fixes. The driver is still useful > > and in the future it will be expanded towards AVS. Therefore please pull > > it or optionally wait a week and I will send incremental pull request > > with fixes. > > Pulled into arm/drivers for now. > > I have drafted a related patch recently, regarding the related > arch/arm/plat-samsung/cpu.c file. This is part of a longer series > I'm working on, see https://pastebin.com/ZqeU3Mth for the > current version of this patch. You can then also adjust the include path in arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile. > The observation is that mach-exynos > is almost completely independent of plat-samsung these days, and my > patch removes the last obstacle from separating the two. I have > another set of patches to do the same for mach-s5pv210 (which shares > half of its pm.c with plat-samsung, but nothing else). Great! Best regards, Krzysztof
