On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 02:20:06PM +0200, Artur Świgoń wrote:
> This patch adds a new static function, exynos_bus_profile_init(), extracted
> from exynos_bus_probe().
>
> Signed-off-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> index d9f377912c10..d8f1efaf2d49 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> @@ -372,12 +372,69 @@ static int exynos_bus_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int exynos_bus_profile_init(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> + struct devfreq_dev_profile *profile)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = bus->dev;
> + struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *ondemand_data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Initialize the struct profile and governor data for parent device */
> + profile->polling_ms = 50;
> + profile->target = exynos_bus_target;
> + profile->get_dev_status = exynos_bus_get_dev_status;
> + profile->exit = exynos_bus_exit;
> +
> + ondemand_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ondemand_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ondemand_data) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err;
Just return proper error code. Less lines, obvious code since you do not
have any cleanup in error path.
> + }
> + ondemand_data->upthreshold = 40;
> + ondemand_data->downdifferential = 5;
> +
> + /* Add devfreq device to monitor and handle the exynos bus */
> + bus->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(dev, profile,
> + DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND,
> + ondemand_data);
> + if (IS_ERR(bus->devfreq)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to add devfreq device\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(bus->devfreq);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + /* Register opp_notifier to catch the change of OPP */
> + ret = devm_devfreq_register_opp_notifier(dev, bus->devfreq);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register opp notifier\n");
> + goto err;
The same - return err.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
