On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 2:16 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 01:31:43PM -0700, Joseph Kogut wrote: > > Document vendor specific compatible string for Mali gpus on Exynos SoCs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joseph Kogut <joseph.kogut@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.txt | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.txt > > index 1b1a74129141..a9704c736d07 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.txt > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ Required properties: > > + "amlogic,meson-gxm-mali" > > + "rockchip,rk3288-mali" > > + "rockchip,rk3399-mali" > > + + "samsung,exynos-mali" > > Are there any driver differences for Exynos? If not then why adding > another compatible? Wrong question. Are there any hardware differences? (Trick question because difference compared to what?) Really, this shouldn't be 'exynos', but per SoC. But I'll leave it to the Samsung folks to decide how specific it should be. Rob
