Hi Chanwoo,
On 5/2/19 7:15 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On 19. 4. 19. 오후 11:19, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> Add new table rate for BPLL for Exynos5422 SoC supporting Dynamic Memory
>> Controller frequencies for driver's DRAM timings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
>> index d9e6653..ddee8bd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
>> @@ -1323,6 +1323,17 @@ static const struct samsung_pll_rate_table exynos5420_pll2550x_24mhz_tbl[] __ini
>> PLL_35XX_RATE(24 * MHZ, 200000000, 200, 3, 3),
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct samsung_pll_rate_table exynos5422_bpll_rate_table[] = {
>> + PLL_35XX_RATE(24 * MHZ, 825000000, 275, 4, 1),
>> + PLL_35XX_RATE(24 * MHZ, 728000000, 182, 3, 1),
>> + PLL_35XX_RATE(24 * MHZ, 633000000, 211, 4, 1),
>> + PLL_35XX_RATE(24 * MHZ, 543000000, 181, 2, 2),
>> + PLL_35XX_RATE(24 * MHZ, 413000000, 413, 6, 2),
>> + PLL_35XX_RATE(24 * MHZ, 275000000, 275, 3, 3),
>> + PLL_35XX_RATE(24 * MHZ, 206000000, 206, 3, 3),
>> + PLL_35XX_RATE(24 * MHZ, 165000000, 110, 2, 3),
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct samsung_pll_rate_table exynos5420_epll_24mhz_tbl[] = {
>> PLL_36XX_RATE(24 * MHZ, 600000000U, 100, 2, 1, 0),
>> PLL_36XX_RATE(24 * MHZ, 400000000U, 200, 3, 2, 0),
>> @@ -1465,7 +1476,7 @@ static void __init exynos5x_clk_init(struct device_node *np,
>> exynos5x_plls[apll].rate_table = exynos5420_pll2550x_24mhz_tbl;
>> exynos5x_plls[epll].rate_table = exynos5420_epll_24mhz_tbl;
>> exynos5x_plls[kpll].rate_table = exynos5420_pll2550x_24mhz_tbl;
>> - exynos5x_plls[bpll].rate_table = exynos5420_pll2550x_24mhz_tbl;
>> + exynos5x_plls[bpll].rate_table = exynos5422_bpll_rate_table;
>
> According to your previous reply, the released odroid-xu3 board by hardkernel
> might be only CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5422_REV_0. Because the kernel configurattion
> from hardkernel has 'CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5422_REV_0=y'. I'm ok about adding bpll rate_table.
>
> But, just I have one question. I think that this bpll rate_table is for
> only Exynos5422 series. Because the kernel of hardkernel used
> driver/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5422.c instead of clk-exynos5420.c commonn driver.
> It means that the clk-exynos5422.c of hardkernel's kernel support only Exynos5422
> without any considering the Exynos5420 series.
>
> I think that it might need to check the soc version to use
> bpll rate_table as following:
Fair enough.
>
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> @@ -1438,7 +1438,10 @@ static void __init exynos5x_clk_init(struct device_node *np,
> exynos5x_plls[apll].rate_table = exynos5420_pll2550x_24mhz_tbl;
> exynos5x_plls[epll].rate_table = exynos5420_epll_24mhz_tbl;
> exynos5x_plls[kpll].rate_table = exynos5420_pll2550x_24mhz_tbl;
> - exynos5x_plls[bpll].rate_table = exynos5422_bpll_rate_table;
> +
> + if (soc == EXYNOS5800)
> + exynos5x_plls[bpll].rate_table
> + = exynos5422_bpll_rate_table;
> }
>
I will add this check. Thank you.
Regards,
Lukasz
>
>> }
>>
>> samsung_clk_register_pll(ctx, exynos5x_plls, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5x_plls),
>>
>
>
