On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 09:32, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 25.03.2019 08:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 08:13, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> GSCALER should be feed with clock at certain rates. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Already merged !!! > > Then you should skip it because someone might not notice it and apply > > second time. > > > I was asked to rebase the patchset on exynos-drm-next, but it does not > contains yet these patches, > > so without adding it here "someone might not notice it and" can complain > that patchset is broken :) > > Maybe better solution would be point to point out samsung-soc tree tag > which should exynos-drm-next be based on? Next time I will try this way. Yes, I see. If needed, I can provide stable tag with DTS patches however in general this is discouraged because it means that you break the ABI. Updated driver does not work with old DTBs... so the best way is to split the patchset and bring in the second part of driver changes later. :) Best regards, Krzysztof
