Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Check for NULL widget in dapm_update_dai_unlocked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 11:05, Charles Keepax
<ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> DAIs linked to the dummy will not have an associated playback/capture
> widget, so we need to skip the update in that case.
>
> Fixes: 078a85f2806f ("ASoC: dapm: Only power up active channels from a DAI")
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Ok so that all makes sense, this patch is probably the best fix?
>
> Thanks,
> Charles

For this particular issue (NULL-pointer):
Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>

However now I see bug sleeping in atomic context:

[   64.000828] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
../kernel/locking/mutex.c:908
[   64.008483] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 353, name: aplay
[   64.014978] 2 locks held by aplay/353:
[   64.018671]  #0: 1fb9b63d (&(&group->lock)->rlock){....}, at:
snd_pcm_action_lock_irq+0x18/0x3c
[   64.027337]  #1: 8b42bfe8 (&(&pri_dai->spinlock)->rlock){....}, at:
i2s_trigger+0x130/0x6c8
[   64.035654] irq event stamp: 8754
[   64.038925] hardirqs last  enabled at (8753): [<c0a78758>]
_raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x5c
[   64.047094] hardirqs last disabled at (8754): [<c0a785a0>]
_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x18/0x50
[   64.055068] softirqs last  enabled at (8096): [<c0102698>]
__do_softirq+0x4f0/0x5e4
[   64.062680] softirqs last disabled at (8083): [<c012ee94>]
irq_exit+0x160/0x16c
[   64.069953] Preemption disabled at:
[   64.069956] [<00000000>]   (null)
[   64.076700] CPU: 6 PID: 353 Comm: aplay Not tainted
5.0.0-rc5-next-20190206-00001-g101ffa564f78 #348
[   64.085822] Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
[   64.091882] [<c0112318>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010df2c>]
(show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[   64.099601] [<c010df2c>] (show_stack) from [<c0a5626c>]
(dump_stack+0x98/0xc4)
[   64.106788] [<c0a5626c>] (dump_stack) from [<c0156ac8>]
(___might_sleep+0x264/0x2cc)
[   64.114501] [<c0156ac8>] (___might_sleep) from [<c0a732b4>]
(__mutex_lock+0x40/0xa98)
[   64.122300] [<c0a732b4>] (__mutex_lock) from [<c0a73d28>]
(mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24)
[   64.130275] [<c0a73d28>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c04c2838>]
(clk_prepare_lock+0x50/0xf8)
[   64.138596] [<c04c2838>] (clk_prepare_lock) from [<c04c5f48>]
(clk_core_get_rate+0xc/0x60)
[   64.146824] [<c04c5f48>] (clk_core_get_rate) from [<c07b419c>]
(i2s_trigger+0x444/0x6c8)
[   64.154883] [<c07b419c>] (i2s_trigger) from [<c079cba0>]
(soc_pcm_trigger+0x100/0x140)
[   64.162768] [<c079cba0>] (soc_pcm_trigger) from [<c07839c0>]
(snd_pcm_action_single+0x38/0x80)
[   64.171349] [<c07839c0>] (snd_pcm_action_single) from [<c0783a5c>]
(snd_pcm_action+0x54/0x5c)
[   64.179841] [<c0783a5c>] (snd_pcm_action) from [<c0783bd4>]
(snd_pcm_action_lock_irq+0x28/0x3c)
[   64.188508] [<c0783bd4>] (snd_pcm_action_lock_irq) from
[<c07860b0>] (snd_pcm_ioctl+0x920/0x123c)
[   64.197350] [<c07860b0>] (snd_pcm_ioctl) from [<c02aa6d4>]
(do_vfs_ioctl+0xb0/0x9f8)
[   64.205054] [<c02aa6d4>] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<c02ab050>]
(ksys_ioctl+0x34/0x5c)
[   64.212418] [<c02ab050>] (ksys_ioctl) from [<c0101000>]
(ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28)
[   64.220045] Exception stack(0xe69dffa8 to 0xe69dfff0)
[   64.225058] ffa0:                   004391b8 00001770 00000004
00004142 00439340 00439340
[   64.233218] ffc0: 004391b8 00001770 00001770 00000036 00001770
00000000 00000000 be8db940
[   64.241361] ffe0: b6fa382c be8db8ec b6f32a3c b6e42bdc
[   64.246386]
[   64.247823] ======================================================
[   64.253979] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[   64.260133] 5.0.0-rc5-next-20190206-00001-g101ffa564f78 #348
Tainted: G        W
[   64.268193] ------------------------------------------------------
[   64.274342] aplay/353 is trying to acquire lock:
[   64.278937] 51044846 (prepare_lock){+.+.}, at: clk_prepare_lock+0x50/0xf8
[   64.285694]
[   64.285694] but task is already holding lock:
[   64.291500] 8b42bfe8 (&(&pri_dai->spinlock)->rlock){....}, at:
i2s_trigger+0x130/0x6c8
[   64.299387]
[   64.299387] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[   64.299387]
[   64.307534]
[   64.307534] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[   64.314985]
[   64.314985] -> #1 (&(&pri_dai->spinlock)->rlock){....}:
[   64.321667]        clk_mux_set_parent+0x34/0xb8
[   64.326162]        clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x21c/0x54c
[   64.331535]        clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c
[   64.335696]        of_clk_set_defaults+0x11c/0x384
[   64.340460]        of_clk_add_provider+0x8c/0xc8
[   64.345054]        samsung_i2s_probe+0x484/0x64c
[   64.349651]        platform_drv_probe+0x6c/0xa4
[   64.354153]        really_probe+0x280/0x414
[   64.358311]        driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1c4
[   64.362991]        bus_for_each_drv+0x74/0xb8
[   64.367323]        __device_attach+0xd4/0x16c
[   64.371655]        bus_probe_device+0x88/0x90
[   64.375988]        deferred_probe_work_func+0x4c/0xd0
[   64.381017]        process_one_work+0x228/0x810
[   64.385520]        worker_thread+0x30/0x570
[   64.389681]        kthread+0x134/0x164
[   64.393405]        ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20
[   64.397477]          (null)
[   64.400249]
[   64.400249] -> #0 (prepare_lock){+.+.}:
[   64.405539]        __mutex_lock+0x7c/0xa98
[   64.409610]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
[   64.414029]        clk_prepare_lock+0x50/0xf8
[   64.418362]        clk_core_get_rate+0xc/0x60
[   64.422695]        i2s_trigger+0x444/0x6c8
[   64.426768]        soc_pcm_trigger+0x100/0x140
[   64.431188]        snd_pcm_action_single+0x38/0x80
[   64.435953]        snd_pcm_action+0x54/0x5c
[   64.440112]        snd_pcm_action_lock_irq+0x28/0x3c
[   64.445052]        snd_pcm_ioctl+0x920/0x123c
[   64.449386]        do_vfs_ioctl+0xb0/0x9f8
[   64.453457]        ksys_ioctl+0x34/0x5c
[   64.457269]        ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28
[   64.461516]        0xbe8db8ec
[   64.464460]
[   64.464460] other info that might help us debug this:
[   64.464460]
[   64.472438]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   64.472438]
[   64.478327]        CPU0                    CPU1
[   64.482831]        ----                    ----
[   64.487336]   lock(&(&pri_dai->spinlock)->rlock);
[   64.492017]                                lock(prepare_lock);
[   64.497823]
lock(&(&pri_dai->spinlock)->rlock);
[   64.505017]   lock(prepare_lock);
[   64.508306]
[   64.508306]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   64.508306]
[   64.514203] 2 locks held by aplay/353:
[   64.517935]  #0: 1fb9b63d (&(&group->lock)->rlock){....}, at:
snd_pcm_action_lock_irq+0x18/0x3c
[   64.526596]  #1: 8b42bfe8 (&(&pri_dai->spinlock)->rlock){....}, at:
i2s_trigger+0x130/0x6c8
[   64.534915]
[   64.534915] stack backtrace:
[   64.539246] CPU: 6 PID: 353 Comm: aplay Tainted: G        W
5.0.0-rc5-next-20190206-00001-g101ffa564f78 #348
[   64.549734] Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
[   64.555802] [<c0112318>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010df2c>]
(show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[   64.563515] [<c010df2c>] (show_stack) from [<c0a5626c>]
(dump_stack+0x98/0xc4)
[   64.570708] [<c0a5626c>] (dump_stack) from [<c01846b0>]
(print_circular_bug+0x210/0x334)
[   64.578765] [<c01846b0>] (print_circular_bug) from [<c01874ec>]
(__lock_acquire+0x12cc/0x1a5c)
[   64.587344] [<c01874ec>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c01886d8>]
(lock_acquire+0xe0/0x268)
[   64.595142] [<c01886d8>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0a732f0>]
(__mutex_lock+0x7c/0xa98)
[   64.602768] [<c0a732f0>] (__mutex_lock) from [<c0a73d28>]
(mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24)
[   64.610740] [<c0a73d28>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c04c2838>]
(clk_prepare_lock+0x50/0xf8)
[   64.619059] [<c04c2838>] (clk_prepare_lock) from [<c04c5f48>]
(clk_core_get_rate+0xc/0x60)
[   64.627291] [<c04c5f48>] (clk_core_get_rate) from [<c07b419c>]
(i2s_trigger+0x444/0x6c8)
[   64.635349] [<c07b419c>] (i2s_trigger) from [<c079cba0>]
(soc_pcm_trigger+0x100/0x140)
[   64.643235] [<c079cba0>] (soc_pcm_trigger) from [<c07839c0>]
(snd_pcm_action_single+0x38/0x80)
[   64.651815] [<c07839c0>] (snd_pcm_action_single) from [<c0783a5c>]
(snd_pcm_action+0x54/0x5c)
[   64.660306] [<c0783a5c>] (snd_pcm_action) from [<c0783bd4>]
(snd_pcm_action_lock_irq+0x28/0x3c)
[   64.668972] [<c0783bd4>] (snd_pcm_action_lock_irq) from
[<c07860b0>] (snd_pcm_ioctl+0x920/0x123c)
[   64.677811] [<c07860b0>] (snd_pcm_ioctl) from [<c02aa6d4>]
(do_vfs_ioctl+0xb0/0x9f8)
[   64.685522] [<c02aa6d4>] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<c02ab050>]
(ksys_ioctl+0x34/0x5c)
[   64.692887] [<c02ab050>] (ksys_ioctl) from [<c0101000>]
(ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28)
[   64.700510] Exception stack(0xe69dffa8 to 0xe69dfff0)
[   64.705536] ffa0:                   004391b8 00001770 00000004
00004142 00439340 00439340
[   64.713684] ffc0: 004391b8 00001770 00001770 00000036 00001770
00000000 00000000 be8db940
[   64.721828] ffe0: b6fa382c be8db8ec b6f32a3c b6e42bdc


Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux