Re: [PATCH 08/10] clk: samsung: Add support for setting registers state before suspend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 17:51, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Some registers of clock controller have to be set to certain values before
> entering system suspend state. Till now drivers did that on their own,
> but it will be easier to handle it by generic code and let drivers simply
> to provide the list of registers and their state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
> index 8634884aa11c..ab467a7f973a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
> @@ -290,9 +290,12 @@ static int samsung_clk_suspend(void)
>  {
>         struct samsung_clock_reg_cache *reg_cache;
>
> -       list_for_each_entry(reg_cache, &clock_reg_cache_list, node)
> +       list_for_each_entry(reg_cache, &clock_reg_cache_list, node) {
>                 samsung_clk_save(reg_cache->reg_base, reg_cache->rdump,
>                                 reg_cache->rd_num);
> +               samsung_clk_restore(reg_cache->reg_base, reg_cache->rsuspend,
> +                               reg_cache->rsuspend_num);
> +       }
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -310,9 +313,11 @@ static struct syscore_ops samsung_clk_syscore_ops = {
>         .resume = samsung_clk_resume,
>  };
>
> -void samsung_clk_sleep_init(void __iomem *reg_base,
> +void samsung_clk_sleep_init2(void __iomem *reg_base,

Like Chanwoo, I also do not like the init2. Quite frankly, I do not
see what problem you want to solve it by adding "2" suffix - not
touching Exynos5433 code? In such case more meaningful prefix would be
better. But I think this should be avoided especially that in patch
9/10 you use both of them.

Separate topic - It is getting confusing. The existing Exynos5433 code
has support for suspend_regs (used in its device-level runtime PM) and
here you are extending generic code on syscore level. Maybe this could
be unified somehow?

Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux