On 18 July 2018 at 12:30, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 18 July 2018 at 15:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 18 July 2018 at 11:34, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Add missing GIC interrupts property for pwm nodes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>>> index 5d2f0a0..9406108 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>>> @@ -169,6 +169,11 @@
>>> pwm: pwm@12dd0000 {
>>> compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm";
>>> reg = <0x12DD0000 0x100>;
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>
>> Indentation here looks weird - spaces used after tabs but not aligned
>> with first entry. Please indent it properly and align it.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> I ram checkpatch before I submit this patch it shown no error.
>
> # scripts/checkpatch.pl --no-signoff -q
> 0001-ARM-dts-exynos5-add-missing-interrupts-for-pwm-node.patch
That's good, thank you. Still when I look at it in patchwork the
indentation is wrong:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10531753/
However it can be patchwork's fault, so are you sure that this is
properly indented and aligned?
BR,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
