Hi Ulf, On 2018-06-11 14:24, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 11 June 2018 at 11:50, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 2018-06-11 11:35, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> On 11 June 2018 at 08:48, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq() performs DWMMC register access without >>>> ensuring that respective clocks are enabled. This might cause external >>>> abort on some systems (observed on Exynos5433 based boards). Fix this >>>> by adding needed prepare_enable/disable_unprepare calls. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 6 ++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c >>>> index 3164681108ae..6125b68726b0 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c >>>> @@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) >>>> struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv; >>>> u32 clksel; >>>> >>>> + clk_prepare_enable(host->biu_clk); >>>> + clk_prepare_enable(host->ciu_clk); >>>> + >>>> if (priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS7 || >>>> priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS7_SMU) >>>> clksel = mci_readl(host, CLKSEL64); >>>> @@ -207,6 +210,9 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) >>>> mci_writel(host, CLKSEL, clksel); >>>> } >>>> >>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->biu_clk); >>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ciu_clk); >>>> + >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>>> #else >>> I looked a little closer and I am wondering if it wouldn't be possible >>> to use SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() instead of >>> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS()? >>> >>> Somelike this: >>> SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, >>> dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq) >>> >>> Then from dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq() call pm_runtime_force_resume(). >>> >>> I think it would simplify the code a bit, as you can rely on the >>> runtime PM callbacks to deal with clk_prepare_enable() and >>> clk_disable_unprepare(), unless I am mistaken. >> This will not fix the problem, because mci_writel() calls in >> dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq are done unconditionally, regardless of the >> controller's runtime pm state. Since commit 1d9174fbc55e after calling >> pm_runtime_force_resume() there is no guarantee that device is in >> runtime active state if it was runtime suspended state. > Yes, because the runtime PM usage count is greater than 1. > (pm_runtime_get_noresume() is called during probe). > > If you want to make this explicit (not relying on ->probe()), one can > add a ->suspend_noirq() callback and call pm_runtime_get_noresume() in > it. Sorry, but I don't get how this would work. Exactly the same pattern as you have proposed was already used in s3c-64xx SPI driver and it didn't work properly (tested on the same SoC as this DW-MMC change). I had to move register access to runtime resume callback to fix external abort issue: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=e935dba111621bd6a0c5d48e6511a4d9885103b4 Here in DW-MMC driver such approach (moving all the code to runtime resume callback) is not possible because of the potential interrupt storm caused by the hw bug (that's the reason of using noirq resume callback). Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |