On 22-05-18, 10:27, Frank Mori Hess wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Well looks like even adding support for sync_pause doesn't solve your issue on > > pl330. Do you want to move this to PIO mode then..? The issue for which you requested the revert of pl330 pause > I'm not sure what you think my issue is with the pl330, are you > confusing me with Marek? My position is that pause is unsupported by > the pl330 at the hardware level. Nothing the pl330.c driver or > dmaengine api or 8250 serial driver does will change that. That is > why I sent a patch to remove pause support from pl330.c. The rest is > just trying to fix some bugs in mainline Linux I hit when I was a > naive youngster who thought Linux support for the computer world's > canonical serial uart could be counted on to move data from point A to > point B. In truth though, I've already concluded it's not worth it to > slog though the linux kernel development process just to clean up > other people's messes. I've already fixed my issues out-of-tree. I > don't mind answering questions if anyone else cares about the issue > though. Other than that, I think I'll just be ghosting out now. ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |