On 14 May 2018 at 14:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 14 May 2018 at 14:22, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 05/14/2018 12:17 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> >>>> Bisected to: >>>> 8c123c14bbba4add148536b6d47a9226deda2f7a is the first bad commit >>>> commit 8c123c14bbba4add148536b6d47a9226deda2f7a >>>> Author: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Date: Thu Apr 26 10:53:06 2018 +0200 >>>> >>>> driver core: Respect all error codes from dev_pm_domain_attach() >>>> >>>> The limitation of being able to check only for -EPROBE_DEFER from >>>> dev_pm_domain_attach() has been removed. Hence let's respect all error >>>> codes and bail out accordingly. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> The DRM driver creates the HDMI codec but its registration fails, due >>> to some missing clocks. The clock are missing because the exynos5-subcmu >>> driver probing fails. >>> >>> [ 0.678578] exynos5-subcmu: probe of GSC failed with error -17 >>> [ 0.679250] exynos5-subcmu: probe of MFC failed with error -17 >>> [ 0.679992] exynos5-subcmu: probe of DISP failed with error -17 >>> >>> The exynos5-subcmu driver before registering platform device makes >>> of_genpd_add_device() call, so in platform_drv_probe() dev_pm_domain_attach() >>> call will fail, as dev->pm_domain is already set. Previously the error >>> was masked by code removed in the above commit and platform_drv_probe() >>> was could complete successfully. >> >> Thanks for providing this information! >> >> I was about to tell that I overlooked the fact that there is more than >> one way to assign PM domain pointers to devices. To fix the problem, >> dev_pm_domain_attach() should return 0, not -EEXIST when it finds and >> existing PM domain pointer. >> >> Does the below patch fix the problem? >> >> From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 14:26:16 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Don't return -EEXIST at attach when PM domain >> exists >> >> As dev_pm_domain_attach() isn't the only way to assign PM domain pointers >> to devices, clearly we must allow a device to have the pointer already >> being assigned. For this reason, return 0 instead of -EEXIST. >> >> Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/base/power/common.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > Yes, this fixes the issue. > Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for the confirmation! I am going to re-post the patch to include linux-pm, then let's see how Rafael wants to handle it. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |