Hey, On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 01:51:25PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Move ->tmu_clear_irqs call from ->tmu_initialize method to > exynos_tmu_initialize(). > > There should be no functional changes caused by this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 12 +++--------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c > index 1664d37..82484c5 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c > @@ -368,8 +368,10 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev) > status = readb(data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_STATUS); > if (!status) > ret = -EBUSY; > - else > + else { > data->tmu_initialize(pdev); > + data->tmu_clear_irqs(data); > + } You should actually enclose the if statement also in curls here: if (!status) { ret = -EBUSY; } else { data->tmu_initialize(pdev); data->tmu_clear_irqs(data); } Fixing myself, but next time pay attention to kernel coding style CHECK: Unbalanced braces around else statement #35: FILE: drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c:371: + else { total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 43 lines checked > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html