Hi, On 26/04/2018 15:45:44+0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Thursday, 26 April 2018 15:36:15 EEST Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:58:19PM +0530, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > > > It's been a while since we introduced drm_dev{get/put} functions > > > to replace reference/unreference in drm subsystem for the > > > consistency purpose. So, with this patch, let's just replace > > > all current use cases of drm_dev_unref() with drm_dev_put and remove > > > the function itself. > > > > > > Coccinelle was used for mass-patching. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar <vthakkar1994@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks for doing this. Unfortunately drm moves pretty fast, so already a > > conflict when I tried to apply this. Some drivers are also in their own > > trees, so this might lead to more fun :-/ > > > > Can you pls split it up per-driver (just the directories under > > drivers/gpu/drm/ is enough)? Final patch to remove the function might then > > get stalled a bit ofc. > > I requested a single patch instead of splitting it per driver, you might want > to blame me for that. > Doesn't splitting the change per driver break bisectability unless there is a guarantee that the change in include/drm/drm_drv.h is applied after all the driver trees have been merged? -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html