Hi Krzysztof,
On 2018년 04월 25일 05:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Exynos5440 is not actively developed, there are no development
> boards available and probably there are no real products with it.
> Remove wide-tree support for Exynos5440.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 14 +-
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 155 +--------------------
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)
After applied this patch, I tested the build and found out
'exynos5440' keyword. There is one comment including 'exynos5440' as following:
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index f92f470bce21..cb525228cfe1 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static void exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs(struct exynos_tmu_data *data)
* Exynos3250, Exynos4412, Exynos5250 and Exynos5260 incorrectly
* states that INTCLEAR register has a different placing of bits
* responsible for FALL IRQs than INTSTAT register. Exynos5420
- * and Exynos5440 documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't
+ * documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't
* support FALL IRQs at all).
*/
writel(val_irq, data->base + tmu_intclear);
After removing it, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
