Re: [PATCH] ARM: s3c64xx: don't select ARM_AMBA from S3C64XX_PL080

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31 May 2017 at 14:25, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:58:34PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Yes, selecting ARM_AMBA from drivers is definitely not right; this
>> symbol should be selected only by platforms that want AMBA primecell
>> bus support, not by drivers, precisely because of these dependency
>> issues.
>>
>> There's another case where ARM_AMBA is selected that probably needs
>> fixing - the coresight hwtracing code.
>
> [Adding Mathieu to cc]
>
> Mathieu,
>
> do you remember how we ended up with this?

That was part of the initial driver submission that happened a couple
of years ago.  The driver depended on AMBA and as such I added the
"select", not knowing it was preferable to have a "depends".

>
> menuconfig CORESIGHT
>        bool "CoreSight Tracing Support"
>        select ARM_AMBA
>
> As Russell says, probably shouldn't select that symbol, most likely
> we want either the individual drivers that register an amba_driver to have
> a 'depends on ARM_AMBA' or alternatively replace the 'select' with 'depends
> on' for the entire subsystem.

I'm good with that.

Mathieu

>
>         Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux