On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> soc_is_exynosMMMM is staged for removal after adopting to exynos-chipid
> driver, so let's remove/minimize usage of any such helper function usage
> from pm.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> index 1a7e5b5..4a73b02 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
> @@ -123,11 +123,13 @@ int exynos_pm_central_resume(void)
> }
>
> /* Ext-GIC nIRQ/nFIQ is the only wakeup source in AFTR */
> -static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(long mask)
> +static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(void)
> {
> - pmu_raw_writel(mask, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK);
> - if (soc_is_exynos3250())
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) {
> + pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS3_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK);
> pmu_raw_writel(0x0, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK2);
> + } else
> + pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK);
You need {} around this too. Checkpatch should complain about it as
well so be sure to run it.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
