On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:49:09PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 08:20:11PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Hi Charles,
> >
> > 2017-03-01 2:04 GMT+09:00 Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > As the pinctrl is now added before the GPIOs are registered we need to
> > > manually calculate what the GPIO base will be, otherwise the base for
> > > each gpio_range will be set to zero. Fortunately the driver
> > > already assigns a GPIO base, in samsung_gpiolib_register, and uses the
> > > same calculation it does for the pin_base. Meaning the two will always
> > > be the same and allowing us to reuse the pinbase and avoid the issue.
> >
> > Sorry, I didn't notice before and I don't see the offending patch in ,
> > but you should add
> >
> > Fixes: XXXXXXXXXXXX ("pinctrl: Patch subject")
> >
> > if you intend to submit this patch separately. Otherwise, maybe this
> > can be just squashed?
> >
>
> Yeah apologies for that as the original patch hasn't showed up in
> the tree yet I couldn't pull a commit ID to add the fixes tag.
> Squashing it in is probably the best way to go.
Hi Charles,
Thanks for the work.
This is a follow up of:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9577147/
Right?
None of these two were applied so can you squash them, rebase, retest
and send again?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
