Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:17:27PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> + Exynos maintainers (for new regresion on exynos5250-snow) >> >> kernelci.org bot <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > mainline boot: 179 boots: 1 failed, 168 passed with 10 offline (v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec) >> > >> > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/mainline/kernel/v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec/ >> > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/mainline/kernel/v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec/ >> > >> > Tree: mainline >> > Branch: local/master >> > Git Describe: v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec >> > Git Commit: 318c8932ddec5c1c26a4af0f3c053784841c598e >> > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git >> > Tested: 57 unique boards, 21 SoC families, 29 builds out of 207 >> > >> > Boot Regressions Detected: >> > >> > arm: >> > >> > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n: >> > exynos5250-snow: >> > lab-collabora: new failure (last pass: v4.9-rc8-51-gbc3913a5378c) >> > >> > Boot Failure Detected: >> > >> > arm: >> > >> > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n >> > exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab > > Nothing was happening recently around Exynos code (at least mach/dts). > Was the 318c8932ddec5c1c26a4af0f3c053784841c598e pointed out by bisect? The bisect[1] pointed to this, but that doesn't smell right, and I wasn't able to dig into it any further: 2513940989fa2c56d0aeb4f5792d22804d92ab4c is the first bad commit commit 2513940989fa2c56d0aeb4f5792d22804d92ab4c Author: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Nov 25 09:45:28 2016 +1100 Full bisect log is here[1]. Kevin [1] https://ci.linaro.org/view/people/job/tbaker-boot-bisect-bot/171/console -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |