On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:17:27PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > + Exynos maintainers (for new regresion on exynos5250-snow) > > kernelci.org bot <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > mainline boot: 179 boots: 1 failed, 168 passed with 10 offline (v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec) > > > > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/mainline/kernel/v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec/ > > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/mainline/kernel/v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec/ > > > > Tree: mainline > > Branch: local/master > > Git Describe: v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec > > Git Commit: 318c8932ddec5c1c26a4af0f3c053784841c598e > > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > Tested: 57 unique boards, 21 SoC families, 29 builds out of 207 > > > > Boot Regressions Detected: > > > > arm: > > > > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n: > > exynos5250-snow: > > lab-collabora: new failure (last pass: v4.9-rc8-51-gbc3913a5378c) > > > > Boot Failure Detected: > > > > arm: > > > > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n > > exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab Nothing was happening recently around Exynos code (at least mach/dts). Was the 318c8932ddec5c1c26a4af0f3c053784841c598e pointed out by bisect? Best regads, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |