On Wednesday, August 31, 2016 3:07:00 PM CEST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Ok, sounds reasonable. I want to convert also older platforms S3C (drive > strengths and pull up/down differ) and arm64 SoC: Exynos7. For the > latter the problem is there is no common place for sharing DTS, except > the headers. However this does not really belong to headers. I guess > some level of duplication might be still exist. We have stuff in the headers that belongs way less there, so I wouldn't mind, but having a separate set of definitions for arm64 also isn't a problem at all. > > I think overall, a better solution would have been to define the > > constants globally (shared with non-exynos) to start with, > > and have the driver translate generic numbers into vendor > > specific ones. Obviously it's too late for that now. > > We could extend driver by adding new bindings accepting generic numbers > (and still backward compatible) but this looks like an overkill. Agreed, that would only make things more confusing, not less. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |