On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 22-06-16, 10:36, Ben Dooks wrote: >> The use of __raw IO accesors is not endian safe and should be used >> sparingly. The relaxed variants should be as lightweight and also >> are endian safe. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> --- >> drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > For both patches: > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied for v4.8, thanks. When resending the cpufreq-exynos please CC me as well. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |