Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: s5pv210: use relaxed IO accesors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22-06-16, 10:36, Ben Dooks wrote:
> The use of __raw IO accesors is not endian safe and should be used
> sparingly. The relaxed variants should be as lightweight and also
> are endian safe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

For both patches:

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux