On 29 March 2016 at 20:34, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2016 12:09:49 Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> -static void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
>> -{
>> - struct device_node *root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
>> - const struct of_device_id *match;
>> -
>> - match = of_match_node(exynos_cpufreq_matches, root);
>> - if (!match) {
>> - platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
>> - return;
>> - }
>> -
>> - platform_device_register_simple(match->data, -1, NULL, 0);
>> -}
>
> How is the "exynos-cpufreq" case handled now? Is that no longer used now?
> I assume the patch is correct based on Krzysztof's review, but it might be
> good to explain this better.
That's stale code, the driver got removed some time back.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
