On Tuesday 29 March 2016 12:09:49 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> -static void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
> -{
> - struct device_node *root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> - const struct of_device_id *match;
> -
> - match = of_match_node(exynos_cpufreq_matches, root);
> - if (!match) {
> - platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - platform_device_register_simple(match->data, -1, NULL, 0);
> -}
How is the "exynos-cpufreq" case handled now? Is that no longer used now?
I assume the patch is correct based on Krzysztof's review, but it might be
good to explain this better.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
