Hello Alexandre, On 03/18/2016 10:03 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 18/03/2016 at 13:07:17 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote : >> On 18/03/2016 at 08:57:57 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : >>>>>> But yes, we can at least get rid of the else statement. I don't have a >>>>>> strong opinion about the debug information, I left it to avoid someone >>>>>> to tell me that I was removing a useful log. >>>>> >>>>> Although dev_dbg doesn't harm... but isn't driver core printing debug >>>>> message already? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't think it does or at least I didn't find it when looking >>>> at the devm_clk_get() call chain. >>>> >>>>> BR, >>>>> Krzysztof >>>>> >>> >>> Just to make sure that I understood correctly, there's no action I >>> should take in order for this patch to be picked right? IOW, the >>> current version is OK? >>> >> >> I was kind of waiting an answer on the question whether the core already >> prints a message when probe dereferral happens because in that case, >> there is no need for a debug message and we can indeed simplify the >> whole block. > > Ok, I've found the recent commit 13fcffbbdec4e4863a9a9c7792b821cd6d363a8f > > I'll take the patch as is. > > Great, thanks! Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |