2015-08-21 16:21 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > [Adding Przemyslaw Marczak who was working on porting Odroid BL1/BL2/SPL] > > Hello, > > On 08/21/2015 05:59 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 21.08.2015 12:41, Anand Moon wrote: >>> Hi Krzysztof, >>> >>> On 21 August 2015 at 06:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 21.08.2015 03:15, Anand Moon wrote: >>>>> Hi Daniel, >>>>> >>>>> On 20 August 2015 at 21:40, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> On 08/20/2015 12:54 PM, Anand Moon wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Krzysztof/Kukjim, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CPUIdle seen to be not working for Exynos5422 Odroid boards. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is their any way this feature will be implemented in the future. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah a good willing to fix the bl1. More than one year asking for that ! >>>>>> nooo way !! >>>>>> >>>>>> Your answer is at the end of >>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-June/350632.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the explanation. >>>>> >>>>> I was just referring following the source code. >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/hardkernel/linux/blob/odroidxu3-3.10.y/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle-exynos5422.c >>>>> >>>>> It seem that cpufreq and cpuidle go hand in hand. >>>> >>>> Bartlomiej was working on cpufreq for Exynos542x: >>>> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1504.2/03139.html >>>> >>>> It would be nice to have also cpuidle and suspend features working on >>>> Exynos542x family but this depends on firmware. Some time ago I >>>> struggled with suspend on Arndale Octa (Exynos5420) and I failed. I >>>> think the firmware is the issue here. > > There were a lot of Suspend-to-RAM bug fixes lately mostly related to > critical clocks being gated. It would be nice to give a try on recent > kernels and see if is still not working. > >>>> >>>> Actually I am not sure what is your question Anand. You are asking if >>>> someone plans to do this? >>> >>> Yes I am asking are their plans to implement cpufreq and cpuidle simultaneously. >> >> There are no obstacles for implementing them simultaneously so the >> question is rather who plans to do the cpuidle driver for Exynos542x? I > > If the firmware is in a good shape (unfortunately as mentioned by Daniel, > the one in the Odroids are not) then the generic ARM big.LITTLE CPUidle > driver (CONFIG_ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUIDLE) should work. > > It is at least working for me on the Exynos5800 based Peach Pi Chromebook: > > $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuidle/current_driver > big_idle > > $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state*/name > WFI > C1 > > $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state*/usage > 7745 > 10578 > >> don't... at least in nearby future. If I had some spare time then >> probably I would try to make suspend working. >> > > Suspend-to-RAM is at least working on the Exynos5420 and Exynos5800 > Chromebooks. The big.LITTLE cpuidle driver is not a typical Exynos cpuidle driver. It only executes CPU suspend on a cluster which essentially is a power down operation. When we talk about cpuidle on Exynos, we have in mind one of sleep modes: AFTR or LPA (sometimes instead of LPA there is LPD or W-AFTR). Actually this is more like a system idle mode, not CPU idle. The power savings are much bigger than disabling only one cluster. So the question is still valid - whether someone wants or plans to implement cpuidle for Exynos 542x family. Odroid XU3 is not a priority here because energy consumption is not an issue there. This is not a mobile device. Best regards, Krzysztof > > As you mentioned it may depend on the firmware so that does not hold > true for all the Exynos5420/5422/5800 boards but it would be good to > know what is the causing S2R to fail. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |