W dniu 06.08.2015 o 09:23, Rafael J. Wysocki pisze: > On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 04:45:16 PM Kukjin Kim wrote: >> From: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> During probe free the memory allocated to "exynos_info" in case of >> unknown SoC type. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@xxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> [k.kozlowski: Rebased the patch around if(of_machine_is_compatible)] >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Hi Rafael and Viresh, >> >> Since this is a fix to prevent memory leak, it would be better if >> this could be sent to linus during -rc via cpufreq tree. > > I'm not planning more pull requests for 4.2 and this one doesn't seem to be > a good enough reason for a pull request of its own, though. > > Of course, if there are more urgent fixes, I can push it along with them, > but there are none so far. The cpufreq driver will be removed completely in v4.3 or v4.4 with patchset adding cpufreq-dt support for Exynos 4x12. This means that this patch makes sense only for 4.2 and as a stable backport (but it was not marked as such). Anyone thinks that the patch will be worth stable back-porting? Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |