From: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@xxxxxxxxx>
During probe free the memory allocated to "exynos_info" in case of
unknown SoC type.
Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[k.kozlowski: Rebased the patch around if(of_machine_is_compatible)]
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi Rafael and Viresh,
Since this is a fix to prevent memory leak, it would be better if
this could be sent to linus during -rc via cpufreq tree.
Thanks,
Kukjin
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index ae5b2bd..fa3dd84 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = exynos5250_cpufreq_init(exynos_info);
} else {
pr_err("%s: Unknown SoC type\n", __func__);
- return -ENODEV;
+ ret = -ENODEV;
}
if (ret)
@@ -188,12 +188,14 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (exynos_info->set_freq == NULL) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No set_freq function (ERR)\n");
+ ret = -EINVAL;
goto err_vdd_arm;
}
arm_regulator = regulator_get(NULL, "vdd_arm");
if (IS_ERR(arm_regulator)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get resource vdd_arm\n");
+ ret = -EINVAL;
goto err_vdd_arm;
}
@@ -225,7 +227,7 @@ err_cpufreq_reg:
regulator_put(arm_regulator);
err_vdd_arm:
kfree(exynos_info);
- return -EINVAL;
+ return ret;
}
static struct platform_driver exynos_cpufreq_platdrv = {
--
2.0.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
