On 28.07.2015 06:24, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Michal,
>
> The patch looks good to me, just one small comment below.
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Although there is only one choice of chipselect it is necessary to
>> specify it. The driver cannot claim the gpio otherwise.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> --
>> v2
>> - don't move unrelated line
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
>> index b7f4122..62be08a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
>> @@ -688,6 +688,7 @@
>> status = "okay";
>> samsung,spi-src-clk = <0>;
>> num-cs = <1>;
>> + cs-gpios = <&gpa2 5 0>;
>
> NIT: this should be GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH instead of 0 but maybe Kukjin or
> Krzysztof can fixup when applying it?
>
>> };
>>
>> &usbdrd_dwc3 {
>> --
>
> Acked-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Yes, the GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH would be better. Can you re-spin the patch
with this change and respective Acks? Including mine ack:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
