2015-03-31 10:12 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 31/03/2015 at 09:47:15 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote : >> > Are you absolutely sure that the exynos3250 IP is the same as the >> > s3c6410 (I don't know much about the exynos family). The concern being >> > that if at one point you have an errata on one or ther other, you will >> > have to break the DT ABI by undoing this change. >> > >> > Note that I'm fine with it, I'm just asking. >> >> I'm sure about exynos3250 RTC is same with S3C6410 RTC. >> There was little different about that pevious S3C6410 RTC >> don't consider to control the 'rtc_src' clk. >> >> >> But, Javier's patch[1] add the '.needs_src_clk' to control the >> 'rtc_src' clk. After merged this patch, there is no different part between >> Exynos3250 RTC and S3C6410 RTC. >> >> [1] 8792f7772f4f (drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c: add .needs_src_clk to s3c6410 RTC data) >> > > Yes, I saw that the software was handling both the same way, I was > asking about the hardware side. The hardware is exactly the same. Or maybe I should say: I could not find any differences. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |