On 31/03/2015 at 09:47:15 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote : > > Are you absolutely sure that the exynos3250 IP is the same as the > > s3c6410 (I don't know much about the exynos family). The concern being > > that if at one point you have an errata on one or ther other, you will > > have to break the DT ABI by undoing this change. > > > > Note that I'm fine with it, I'm just asking. > > I'm sure about exynos3250 RTC is same with S3C6410 RTC. > There was little different about that pevious S3C6410 RTC > don't consider to control the 'rtc_src' clk. > > > But, Javier's patch[1] add the '.needs_src_clk' to control the > 'rtc_src' clk. After merged this patch, there is no different part between > Exynos3250 RTC and S3C6410 RTC. > > [1] 8792f7772f4f (drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c: add .needs_src_clk to s3c6410 RTC data) > Yes, I saw that the software was handling both the same way, I was asking about the hardware side. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |