Hi Kukjin, > Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > > Hi Eduardo, > > > > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 07:16:53PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > > > + Eduardo > > > > > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 03 March 2015 04:00:14 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > > > Please pull Samsung tmu and hdmi regression fixes for v4.0 > > > > > > and I know this is quite big for fixes but I couldn't > > > > > > handle this series for previous merge window because of > > > > > > dependency with driver side...sorry for that and please > > > > > > pull so that we could support them in v4.0 on exynos > > > > > > platforms. > > > > > > > > > > What kind of dependency do you have there? It really should > > > > > not be necessary to wait for driver changes, unless you do an > > > > > incompatible DT binding change, which you should avoid. > > > > > > > > > For TMU patches, I've asked Eduardo to provide topic branch for > > > > 'include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h' has been added > > > > via thermal tree because if I can't apply the patch in Samsung > > > > tree for arm-soc, kernel build breakage will be happened. But I > > > > couldn't get Eduardo's topic branch. > > > > > > > > > Specifically, the developer, while migrating the driver to > > > support DT and OF thermal, decided to create a header with > > > constants. The header is used by DT files and the driver code. > > > The header was the dependency. > > > > Just my 2 cents :-). > > > > The above situation is the justification for adding the whole patch > > set to one repository when all ACKs are collected for it. > > > I don't think so, even your series can be upstreamed though, other > useless merge conflicts would be happened so we decided all of DT > should be handled in arch side not driver side. So please don't argue > about that. Ok, I will not :-) > > - Kukjin > -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html