Arnd Bergmann wrote: > + Eduardo Hi Arnd, > On Tuesday 03 March 2015 04:00:14 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Please pull Samsung tmu and hdmi regression fixes for v4.0 and I know > > this is quite big for fixes but I couldn't handle this series for > > previous merge window because of dependency with driver side...sorry for > > that and please pull so that we could support them in v4.0 on exynos > > platforms. > > What kind of dependency do you have there? It really should not be > necessary to wait for driver changes, unless you do an incompatible > DT binding change, which you should avoid. > For TMU patches, I've asked Eduardo to provide topic branch for 'include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h' has been added via thermal tree because if I can't apply the patch in Samsung tree for arm-soc, kernel build breakage will be happened. But I couldn't get Eduardo's topic branch. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg41877.html For HDMI patches, I thought the DT changes have a dependency with "drm/exynos: add support for 'hdmi' clock" so waited for its applying then in drm tree. But I couldn't send it to arm-soc after that... http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42173.html I asked about the situation (late DT changes?) when I sent a pull-request, then I couldn't get a access my kernel.org because of biz. trip to China :( http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42235.html > I've pulled it into fixes, but won't forward it until I hear a > good explanation. > As you know, basically I tried to make a clear branch for pull-request but in that case, I couldn't find a solution. Sorry for the inconvenience. I hope v4.0 can support them properly. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |