On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:46:21 -0400
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 07:31:14PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 23 January 2015 at 19:27, Lukasz Majewski
> > <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Please pay a note about following problem:
> > >
> > > Previously we got: cpu0: cpu@0 for all Exynos devices.
> > >
> > > Now, however, cpu numbering has changed (due to GIC rework).
> > > For example:
> > >
> > > Exynos4412:
> > > cpus {
> > > cpu0: cpu@A00 {
> > > ...
> > > #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by
> > > max */ };
> > >
> > > cpu@A01 {
> > > };
> > >
> > > cpu@A02 {
> > > };
> > >
> > > cpu@A03 {
> > > };
> > > }
> > >
> > > Exynos 4210:
> > > cpus {
> > > cpu0: cpu@900 {
> > > #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by
> > > max */ };
> > >
> > > cpu@901 {
> > > };
> > > };
> > >
> > > Exynos 5250:
> > > cpus {
> > > cpu0: cpu@0 {
> > > #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by
> > > max */ };
> > >
> > > cpu@1 {
> > > };
> > > };
> > >
> > >
> > > As you can see different cpu@XXY nodes we have and simply calling
> > > cpu@0 won't work.
> >
> > I wasn't asked you to get the cpu0 node from dt but this:
> >
> > cpu_dev = get_cpu_dev(0);
> > np = of_node_get(cpu_dev->of_node);
> >
> > Wouldn't this work? You only need to guarantee that the
> > cooling-cells is added onto the boot CPUs node.
>
> Lukasz,
>
> I agree with Viresh here, you can simplify your code.
>
> I, somehow, missed this conversation and already applied v6 of this
> patch in my -fixes branch. Can you please fix this by sending a
> differential patch on top of this one applying Viresh's commit?
No problem, I will check this in my office tomorrow.
Thanks.
>
> Viresh, my bad, I missed your comments.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Eduardo
Attachment:
pgpecClyqnw1a.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
