On Thursday 27 November 2014 21:14:59 Tomasz Figa wrote: > > my impression is that with the > > move to arm64, you should come up with a new binding that can fully > > describe each controller so you don't have to add new code and bindings > > for each future SoC that uses the same scheme. > > Still, this is exactly the same thing I thought when initially refactoring this > driver 2 years ago and what was dismissed at that time due to people > supposedly not wanting that much data in DT. If this point of view has changed, > then I fully support your view, though. I guess people were at the time underestimating the rate at which Samsung comes out with new SoC variants that are all slightly different. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |