On Thursday 27 November 2014 16:34:58 Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> +
> +/*
> + * Samsung pinctrl driver data for Exynos5433 SoC. Exynos5433 SoC includes
> + * four gpio/pin-mux/pinconfig controllers.
> + */
> +struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos5433_pin_ctrl[] = {
> + {
> + /* pin-controller instance 0 data */
> + .pin_banks = exynos5433_pin_banks0,
> + .nr_banks = ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5433_pin_banks0),
> + .eint_wkup_init = exynos_eint_wkup_init,
> + .suspend = exynos_pinctrl_suspend,
> + .resume = exynos_pinctrl_resume,
> + .label = "exynos5433-gpio-ctrl0",
> + }, {
>
I'm counting nine controllers, not four ;-)
These seem to all be fairly regular, my impression is that with the
move to arm64, you should come up with a new binding that can fully
describe each controller so you don't have to add new code and bindings
for each future SoC that uses the same scheme.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
