Pankaj Dubey wrote: > > On Friday 21 November 2014 12:55 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:34:29PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > >> Let's handle i2c interrupt re-configuration in i2c driver. This will > >> help us in removing some soc specific checks from machine files and > >> will help in removing static iomapping of SYS register in exynos.c > >> > >> Since only Exynos5250, and Exynos5420 has i2c nodes in DT, added syscon > >> based phandle to i2c device nodes of respective SoC DT files. > >> Well...actually there are 4ch i2c in exynos5410 and exynos5800 as well, i2c nodes are not added in dt files though. > >> Also handle saving and restoring of SYS_I2C_CFG register during > >> suspend and resume of i2c driver. > >> > >> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> CC: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> CC: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> CC: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> CC: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> CC: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> CC: linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-s3c2410.txt | 1 + > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 4 +++ > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 4 +++ > > > > I usually don't take DTS patches. They should go via arm-soc. Please say > > so if there are reasons I should take them. > > I CC'ed to you because same patch contains changes in i2c driver. > I am not very sure via which tree this should go. May be I can ask > samsung SoC maintainer Kukjin to look into this, as patch 2/2 has > changes in mach-exynos which should go via Kukjin's tree. > I'll reply on other email. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |