Oh, you are still alive? I thought you were about to get married :) Just kidding !! On 20 November 2014 00:58, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry for raising this issue always with Exynos cpufreq drivers. IMO the > bindings for "arm-bL-cpufreq-dt" is broken. Currently no one is using it > and it's better to fix it before we have a real user of it. Hmm, yeah if we can. I haven't found a easy way to go ahead and then got caught in other activities. > If you look at the binding document for it[1], it has a fixme which > shouldn't have been there at first place. It assumes the ordering of > CPU's specified in the DT and the logical index allocation to them. Ok, I believe the FIXME is a bit outdated. From the code I can see only this limitation. - For every cluster, the cpu which boots up first should carry the OPPs. Otherwise there is no restriction on ordering of CPUs. - I believe CPUs boot in the order they are present in DT except for the boot CPU. So, the first node for every cluster should have it. Correct ? Then we can update the fixme. > It even breaks for hotplug especially if you hotplug-in back in > different order. Hmm, I never thought about it. But yes the CPU with the OPPs should be the first one to come back. > We can work around that probably, but it's better to > fix the binding. I failed to grab much attention in my previous attempts > to address this[2]. Viresh also started a discussion more recently[3]. They are just stuck and went nowhere :( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |