Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
+ Olof,
> Hello Kevin,
>
Hi,
> On 11/19/2014 06:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with
>>>> reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed.
>>>
>>> I didn't have time to dig, but I'd rather someone track down the DRM
>>> problem and fix that, since it was known to be working. I'm guessing
>>> it's something simple that can be fixed before the merge window opens.
>>
>> OK, so this DRM problem is turning out to be non-trivial, so I think
>> the defconfig patch should be reverted until the DRM issue is sorted
>> out.
>>
>> Otherwise, we risk having boot failures in linux-next which may be
>> hiding other problems.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>
> Agreed with the config revert, so many issues with Exynos DRM in
linux-next :(
>
Yeah, it could be a best solution at this moment. Let me revert the commit
0ef76aea7a34 ("ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable options for display panel
support")
from -next in samsung tree.
Thanks,
Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
