Hello. On 11/17/2014 9:36 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
The host controller by itself may sometimes need to handle PHY and re-initialize it to re-configure some of the PHY parameters to get full support out of the PHY controller. Therefore, facilitate getting the two possible PHYs, viz. USB 2.0 type (UTMI+) and USB 3.0 type (PIPE3), and initialize them.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c index 3d78b0c..5207d5b 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
[...]
@@ -204,6 +271,8 @@ static int xhci_plat_suspend(struct device *dev) struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev); struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd); + phy_exit(hcd->phy);
Hm, in the suspend() method?
phy_exit() should eventually be suspending the PHY and put it to low power state.
I thought it's a role that the power_off() mothod should play, considering that the power_on() method gets called after the init() method....
phy_init() in resume() will then take up the task of activating the PHY again.
phy_power_on() and phy_power_off() are called at xhci_probe() and remove() time.
Of course.
Does this makes sense ?
Not much, really. WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
