On śro, 2014-10-29 at 11:51 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On 10/29/2014 11:44 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On śro, 2014-10-29 at 10:31 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:18:54AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> > On śro, 2014-10-29 at 10:01 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>
> >> > > No, this isn't suspend enable control - this is normal, standard enable
> >> > > control and the device has no suspend enable control.
> >>
> >> > You mean that for such regulator the driver shouldn't implement
> >> > suspend_enable()?
> >>
> >> Yes, if there is no separate control of suspend mode in hardware then of
> >> course the driver shouldn't implement operations for things it doesn't
> >> have.
> >
> > Oh, thanks! I'll send fixed patch.
> >
> > This means that probably the max77802 ("mirrored" driver) should be
> > fixed...
> >
>
> Indeed, I had the same confusion that you had. Just to avoid duplicating work,
> do you want me to send a fix or are you going to include one on your series?
I'll send a patch for max77802 also.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
