Hello Krzysztof,
On 10/29/2014 11:44 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On śro, 2014-10-29 at 10:31 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:18:54AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> > On śro, 2014-10-29 at 10:01 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>> > > No, this isn't suspend enable control - this is normal, standard enable
>> > > control and the device has no suspend enable control.
>>
>> > You mean that for such regulator the driver shouldn't implement
>> > suspend_enable()?
>>
>> Yes, if there is no separate control of suspend mode in hardware then of
>> course the driver shouldn't implement operations for things it doesn't
>> have.
>
> Oh, thanks! I'll send fixed patch.
>
> This means that probably the max77802 ("mirrored" driver) should be
> fixed...
>
Indeed, I had the same confusion that you had. Just to avoid duplicating work,
do you want me to send a fix or are you going to include one on your series?
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
