Hi Tomasz,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 21.10.2014 15:52, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> +&mmc_0 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + num-slots = <1>;
>>> + broken-cd;
>>> + caps2-mmc-hs200-1_8v;
>> Please use mmc_hs200-1_8v instead.
>
> I guess you mean "mmc-hs200-1_8v" (with a hyphen between mmc and hs200).
>
Yes, right, that was a typo. Thanks.
>>> + supports-highspeed;
>> As per synopsys-dw-mshc DT binding documentation, supports-highspeed
>> property is deprecated, so please use common DT binding for this,
>> which is "cap-mmc-highspeed".
>>> + non-removable;
>>> + card-detect-delay = <200>;
>>> + clock-frequency = <800000000>;
>>> + samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
>>> + samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <0 4>;
>>> + samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <0 2>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sd0_clk &sd0_cmd &sd0_qrdy &sd0_bus1 &sd0_bus4 &sd0_bus8>;
>>> + bus-width = <8>;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&mmc_2 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + num-slots = <1>;
>>> + supports-highspeed;
>> Here also common DT binding please "cap-sd-highspeed"
>
> Above you suggest "cap-mmc-highspeed" to replace the same deprecated
> property, but here "cap-sd-highspeed". What is the rationale behind
> using only one particular new property and not both for both controllers?
>
Well, on this particular board dw_mmc channels are dedicated to use
only one kind of card. e.g. mmc_0 is for eMMC and which is
non-removable and mmc_2 is for SD cards. Although controller supports
both the properties on all channel on this SoC.
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
--
Regards,
Alim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
