On 21.10.2014 15:52, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> +&mmc_0 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + num-slots = <1>;
>> + broken-cd;
>> + caps2-mmc-hs200-1_8v;
> Please use mmc_hs200-1_8v instead.
I guess you mean "mmc-hs200-1_8v" (with a hyphen between mmc and hs200).
>> + supports-highspeed;
> As per synopsys-dw-mshc DT binding documentation, supports-highspeed
> property is deprecated, so please use common DT binding for this,
> which is "cap-mmc-highspeed".
>> + non-removable;
>> + card-detect-delay = <200>;
>> + clock-frequency = <800000000>;
>> + samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
>> + samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <0 4>;
>> + samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <0 2>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sd0_clk &sd0_cmd &sd0_qrdy &sd0_bus1 &sd0_bus4 &sd0_bus8>;
>> + bus-width = <8>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&mmc_2 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + num-slots = <1>;
>> + supports-highspeed;
> Here also common DT binding please "cap-sd-highspeed"
Above you suggest "cap-mmc-highspeed" to replace the same deprecated
property, but here "cap-sd-highspeed". What is the rationale behind
using only one particular new property and not both for both controllers?
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
